For me, the most destabilizing and potent aesthetics are those that mess with the known and the unknown. So I like to work with things I think I know to get closer to concepts that I may never get my head around. Metallic gold paint, hearts, flowers, and mirrored ceilings aren't low culture . . they are my culture. Conceptual art, contemporary theory, avant-garde architecture and couture fashion aren't high culture either. . . I'll claim them as well. The only people that care about distinctions between high and low culture aren't interested in beauty or truth anyway. Those that are, know that you better take it wherever you find it. I find it in the things I know and love, Southern California culture, and some big ideas that I can only get at with this odd architectural vocabulary that I speak fluently.
None of the elements of Acido Dorado have a single reference or can be considered separate from the context or the architecture. I feel around for a coherent and irreducible whole where each element modifies the others in such a way that there is no fixed meaning, but a constantly shifting haiku that can be reconsidered moment by moment. The death/life, fake/real, organic and abstract conundrum of the roses feedback from the dead/living landscape of the desert into the reflection/object, mirage-like mirrored surfaces. And those are modified by the real spatial inversion of the mirrored plan layout of the bedrooms, and further by the reflections off the water of the dry desert. The heart window initially invites an ironic pop reading but immediately shuts it down as its sincere and sweet connotations eviscerate irony and pastiche. And then you are left to consider its real materiality, and its reflection and opposition in the abstract composition of the architecture. It’s meaning isn’t in a symbolic statement, or coded references, but in it’s experiential qualities, an odd suspension between magic and logic, and how it transforms things we thought we knew.
I am finding much wider possibilities for architecture simply by continuing an experimental practice that is open, intellectually engaged, and above all- truthful. This approach obviously has none of the hallmarks of the kind of stylistically focused 'movement' that architects always seem to be looking to follow or lead. The dominant paradigm for modern architecture for most of my lifetime has been a certain kind of universal abstract formalism, and I have no intention of challenging that. There will always be some version of corporate pop music and worldwide abstract architecture- I am not out to critique it, I just don't care about it. As always, the real potential is found in an underground culture where new ideas and aesthetics can arise, take risks, and make things that really matter. We can make our own meaningful architecture. And when we do that, we can create authentic new experiences, learn about ourselves, our place, our lives, and our friends in ways that mainstream architecture can barely comprehend, let alone replicate.
More here - www.prettyvacantproperties.com